 March 01, 2006 |
Lost Claires Up a Big Mystery Tonight on ABC's Lost (9 pm/ET), a crisis involving baby Aaron leads Claire to delve into the unsolved mystery of exactly what happened during her Season 1 kidnapping at the hands of ghoulish Ethan Rom (aka the Other man). TVGuide.com spoke to Aussie beauty Emilie de Ravin about Claire's new adventure, her "hard-to-handle" Lost leading man and her frighteningly fun new role. TVGuide.com: I have to wonder, having often flitted between Australia and Los Angeles yourself, was it eerie to do a show about a doomed Oz-L.A. flight?Emilie de Ravin: Yeah, kinda! I never really thought about it too much, though. I think it was more odd that Claire was the only Australian survivor. [Laughs] TVGuide.com: I'm thinking the flight is grueling enough without having to worry about otherworldly interloping. So... as this week's Claire-centric episode gets underway, where is your character's head at?De Ravin: Well, she's going through a lot with her baby not being too well, and that starts to bring back some flashes of repressed memories, and she's not really sure where they're from. Then it comes to light that they're from when she was kidnapped by Ethan. We really learn what happened to her during those days. TVGuide.com: Do we learn everything, or are there some holes left?De Ravin: In Lost tradition, there will be some holes, but it's pretty clear what happened to her when she was away. It clears up a lot of interesting things. TVGuide.com: I'm glad to see them finally pick up this loose thread. And it was nice of Claire to wait for the tailies' stories to be told before she decided to ask herself, "What the hell happened to me?!"De Ravin: [Chuckles] I know! TVGuide.com: Are there any new flashbacks to Claire's preflight life?De Ravin: No, we dealt only with on-island flashbacks to last season, when I was kidnapped. They haven't done an "all on-island" show before, so that was kind of cool. TVGuide.com: And William Mapother is back as Ethan?De Ravin: Yeah, and he's great. I have a lot of fun working with him. TVGuide.com: You should have seen him as this alien infectee on Threshold. Dude is so good at playing bad.De Ravin: He is; he's very creepy! TVGuide.com: Was it fun to have Claire, Kate and Rousseau embark on this adventure?De Ravin: Yes, it was a "little girl hike"! We don't need no men or guns! That was fun, trekking through the wet jungle and dealing with lots of bugs. TVGuide.com: Claire is, after all, done with the pregnancy and getting back into fighting form....De Ravin: Right, and getting ready to join the army. [Laughs] Leave the kid at home! TVGuide.com: After this episode, will Claire be more active in her island existence?De Ravin: I think that has progressively been happening, but she obviously has been held back by having a young baby. You can't endanger yourself too much for that reason. Plus, who do you leave your child with? There aren't too many people she'd leave the child with after what's been happening lately... losing Aaron every five minutes! She's very wary of that. TVGuide.com: Going back to last season's Claire-centric episode, what's your take on what that psychic foresaw? Did he know Claire's plane would crash?De Ravin: I think he did and I think Claire believes he did. But it was more of his overall belief that [whatever happened] would secure the situation in such a way that I would be forced to bring up the baby myself. TVGuide.com: Does this week's episode shed any new light on that mysterious "need" for Claire to watch over Aaron?De Ravin: No, it doesn't. TVGuide.com: How has it been working with that leading man of yours? Baby Aaron, I mean.De Ravin: You mean "the 20 faces of Aaron"? [Laughs] He changes weekly. There are back-up babies for when he needs to be screaming or if he needs to be happy.... And they can't work all day, so there are a couple that come in each day. TVGuide.com: You make it sound like shipping produce. Is it always a local baby, or do they "import" them from L.A.?De Ravin: No, that's what's hard, finding them on the island [of Oahu]. There are a fair amount of Caucasian babies, but not that many. And finding ones approximately the right age is the big problem. Some come to work who are just huge, like 6-month-old babies. Aaron is supposed to be, like, 4 to 4 1/2 weeks old. TVGuide.com: I can see the Honolulu Star-Bulletin want ad now: "Needed: Baby That Ages One Hour per Month."De Ravin: I know, right? It's kind of difficult to hold a baby who wants to sit up in a newborn position. They aren't too happy about that! TVGuide.com: You played a pregnant alien on Roswell. Why do you think that show didn't do better? It seemed to have the right ingredients — young beautiful people, sex, aliens.De Ravin: I think they kept swinging back and forth a little too much between the sci-fi and the high-school drama. But it was an interesting show and it had a huge cult following. TVGuide.com: Speaking of cult faves, you star in The Hills Have Eyes, opening March 10. That's a remake of a rather grisly film.De Ravin: It's quite grisly, yes. [Laughs] It's a story of two families in the very basic sense — one that has been affected by nuclear testing and one that's just on vacation. When they collide, their short lives blend together in an interesting way. TVGuide.com: I assume you're playing a "normal" family member?De Ravin: I am, yes. I get chased but I also get to do some chasing. And I got to use a pickax, which is always fun. TVGuide.com: You have something in common with Maggie Grace [ex-Shannon], who also went off and did a horror-film remake (The Fog).De Ravin: A lot of people have been doing that. Ian [Somerhalder, ex-Boone] did one, and Josh [Holloway] did one.... Like, 9 out of 10 scripts we'd be getting were horror films. What really interested me about The Hills Have Eyes was the story behind it all. It's not just "kill a bunch of people" and that's it. There's quite an interesting undertone to it. TVGuide.com: You also have Brick coming out on March 31, with Joseph Gordon-Levitt and directed by Rian Johnson. That's received some good notices.De Ravin: Yeah, it's up for an Independent Spirit Award in a couple of weeks. I play Emily, this "sweet and impressionable girl."... TVGuide.com: Awwww, come on. You need to be the badass for once! De Ravin: Well, that's what The Hills Have Eyes is for! But Emily, she sort of crosses over to the wrong side of the tracks, thinking that she has to "fit in" with the cool people. She has a huge downfall and becomes this broken girl, and then "bad things" happen to poor Emily. It's very film noir, a very old-school detective story. |
The Most Shocking One Tree Hill Ever? For three seasons, One Tree Hill has been a quiet WB gem among the likes of the quippy Gilmore Girls and the big fun of Smallville. Equal parts addictive teen soap and absorbing family drama, the series is set to gain some well-deserved attention with a school-shooting episode, airing tonight at 8 pm/ET, that could be written off as one of those "very special" clichés if it weren't so... very special. "It's big on a number of fronts," says executive producer Mark Schwahn. "I felt a sense of responsibility [in telling this story] that I don't know if I've ever felt before. This episode deals with something that is happening in the real world — the rise of violence in our schools. And to have the opportunity to address something that's happening now, almost weekly... it's actually heartbreaking." As is the episode. Two and a half minutes into the hour — which for the most part is eerily devoid of the show's signature emo soundtrack — Tree Hill High outcast Jimmy Edwards (Colin Fickes) opens fire in a crowded hallway, triggering not just panic among his classmates but also an examination of the bullying that drives teens to isolation, self-abuse and, in this case, a level of violence that claims two lives. Immediately following the shooting, the school is plunged into lockdown mode, leaving Lucas to tend to a critically injured Peyton, while Nathan, Haley, Skills and several other students find themselves trapped in a classroom with the increasingly unstable Edwards. But unlike, say, the never-again-mentioned death of Beverly Hills 90210's gun-crazy Scott Scanlon, Schwahn hints that survivors and viewers alike will not be able to forget the crisis — or the shattering final 10 minutes of the episode — very soon. "The way one of [the deaths] goes will be unexpected. It's harrowing," reveals Schwahn, who expects to face fans' wrath for killing off a major — and beloved — character in such a brutal, coldhearted manner. "I do feel like there will be a part of the audience that may feel betrayed a little bit. They show up each week to spend an hour in this safe world, and now it's not safe." What is safe is to say that nothing will be the same for any of the key players after this week. "Everyone involved in this episode understands this moment as a tragedy," Schwahn says. "How they respond to it is storytelling gold. Some of them will go really dark. Some of them will be unable to recover emotionally. Some of them will understand that life is very short and precious and that they need to stop being afraid of the things or people that they want in their lives." Which means that there could be fallout for months to come. In fact, Schwahn guarantees it. "Most shows would have saved this for their season finale. I designed this [as a way] to propel us toward our end-of-season cliff-hanger." A cliff-hanger, mind you, that promises to be as suspenseful as the one going on behind the scenes. As UPN and WB prepare to merge into the new CW network, there is still no definite word on OTH's fate. "I don't think we'll get word until right before the [May] upfronts. I think we're certainly on the bubble.... We'd like to be included." Schwahn does reveal, however, that if the show returns in the fall, the new season would cover the second half of the gang's senior year. But with that determination of its fate still months away (and fans rallying to spare the underrated drama at www.PetitionOnline.com/saveoth), he admits that tonight's stellar episode is also his riskiest. "The network and the studio were very afraid of the episode because of the content. Mostly about Jimmy Edwards," he says. "The episode is about this kid.... And then there's this big soapy moment at the end that's not about him. And that's dangerous. Because if you take off the end's [twist], you have this huge, pro-social story that you could have a town meeting about. I think you still could. There's just the extra little piece that is so shocking... but it still fits. It absolutely fits." |
Jena Malone Takes Pride in Prejudice Of all the multinominated films vying for Academy Awards this Sunday, Pride & Prejudice may be the most overlooked. The latest adaptation of Jane Austen's ageless tale picked up four nominations — including a best-actress nod for Keira Knightley — but its buzz is nowhere near that of higher-profile contenders such as Walk the Line and Brokeback Mountain. Jena Malone, who plays Knightley's on-screen sister Lydia is a bit skeptical of putting too much stock in awards, but she hopes the extra attention will bring new audiences to the film. TVGuide.com found this out when we spoke with Malone about the classic romance's arrival this week on DVD. TVGuide.com: Before landing the role of Lydia, were you a fan of Jane Austen's novels?Jena Malone: Well, the only real exposure I had to them was through standardized education, which debilitates the greatness of any novel. When I was actually able to seek them out myself, I found much more in them. I became a much greater fan by working and living that life while filming. TVGuide.com: What is it about Pride & Prejudice that makes it such an enduring story?Malone: I think we are all separated from each other by social classes and expectations. Even today, it's still very hard to meet the right someone for you. Where do people go to meet? What are the rules and regulations for courting? It's something that fascinates us still, so it's interesting to go back in history to learn how those practices are similar to what we experience today. TVGuide.com: What was it like being the only American amongst a mostly British cast?Malone: Coming into it, I was a little scared. I thought there might be cliques to a certain degree, because they had worked in England and worked together before. But they were nothing but wonderful. It was awesome. It was really nice to be accepted as this strange American who has a British woman living in her mouth. TVGuide.com: It seems as though giggling is Lydia's primary form of communication in many scenes. How were you able to bring the character some depth?Malone: You have to trust the director [in this case, Joe Wright] you are working with. You have to give a lot of different types of things and he's going to tell you what's working. Particularly, when they get in the editing room, you see what works and what doesn't. Apparently, my giggling worked. TVGuide.com: Were you at all surprised when you heard that Keira had been nominated for a best-actress Oscar? [Knightley had been largely shut out of other awards-season nods.]Malone: Yes. I mean I was excited for her, because I know all the hard work she put in and I thought she did a wonderful job. But I was also sort of surprised. A surprise like this is a glorious thing, though. I don't really understand a lot of the Academy's choices on things, but this made me think maybe I should start thinking about them differently. TVGuide.com: You voiced a character in the American version of Howl's Moving Castle, which is up for best animated feature. What was that experience like? Malone: It was really strange. I wrote the director [Hayao Miyazaki] at the beginning of 2005, just saying that I respected his work and if there was ever an opportunity to work on any of his movies in the future, to please let me know. Three months later, I got a call saying there was a part available. So I went down to audition, put myself on tape, and I was on a trip to Disneyland with my family when I found out that I got it. The next day, I went to the Disney studios to record it. TVGuide.com: So you became a fan of Miyazaki's work through his previous film, Spirited Away?Malone: Yes. These beautifully strange images and glorious childhood worlds he creates are so full of absurdity, hard truths and bizarre creatures. He's a really interesting filmmaker. TVGuide.com: For such a young actress, you have been in numerous acclaimed indies — from Donnie Darko to Cold Mountain to The Ballad of Jack and Rose. What attracts you to unconventional Hollywood material?Malone: I have no idea... maybe a strange upbringing? There's something about these stories that speaks to something deep inside me. I just want to be a part of them and help tell them. Who else is in the running for an Oscar? And who are the favorites to win? Click here for TVGuide.com's comprehensive Academy Awards coverage. |
Phil Keoghan's Amazing Diary Phil Keoghan, the globe-trotting host of CBS' The Amazing Race (returning tonight at 9 pm/ET), takes TV Guide readers along on the exotic new season's first leg. DAY ONE 6:30 amThere's always this great feeling right before the race begins, this calm before the storm. And as the teams arrive in this spectacular location — Red Rocks Amphitheatre, outside of Denver — you can't imagine that in an hour and a half, this wild animal will be let out of its cage. I always like to walk along the line of the teams' bags. I pick them up and see who is carrying what, to see who has planned ahead and who is completely unrealistic about what they're going to haul around the world for the next month. While some teams have decided they're on a luxury trip, the husband-and-wife team of Lake and Michelle Garner have packed really light. 11:00 amThe teams start arriving at Denver International Airport and have to get on one of three different flights heading to Brazil. After I've checked in, I put on a hat and sit in the corner to hear what the teams say to each other, since it's the first time they are allowed to talk to each other. They only have visual references to judge people, and it never ceases to amaze me how quickly they begin creating nicknames for each other. Instantly the teams decide that best friends B.J. Averell and Tyler MacNiven are "The Hippies," since they are two guys who look like they rarely use a razor. Then B.J. and Tyler spot another team, Danielle Torchio and Danielle Turner. It's fair to say the two Danielles are shapely, and Tyler decides that they should be "the Double-Ds." It's amazing to see how quickly these nicknames stick. DAY TWO9:30 amIt's been almost 20 hours since I said "Go!" and we've finally made it to the São Paolo Airport in Brazil. Just like the best-laid travel plans, things are already going wrong. The flight that was meant to land first was delayed, which changes the whole order for the teams. And there are some teams who haven't realized yet that the language in Brazil is Portuguese, not Spanish. And there's a team that ends up literally walking past the clue box more than five times, even though it's right in front of them. How they missed it I still don't know, but it's certainly going to be entertaining for those watching at home. 1:00 pmThere are two popular ways of getting around in São Paolo — motorbikes or helicopters — so the race's first detour is a choice we've decided to call "Motorhead versus Rotorhead." They have to either assemble a motorcycle from scratch and be able to start it or take a helicopter over the city and look for a specific roof to land on for their clue. One team has decided to assemble their motorcycle in the street, and the locals are quite excited about one team member, Yolanda Brown-Moore, who has the most amazing legs on The Amazing Race. Those of us working on the race have picked who we think are the strongest teams — although I will be the first to admit that my predictions have been extremely unsuccessful every season, which speaks to the unpredictable nature of the show. It always surprises me that people immediately discredit older teams when, if you look at the history of the race, we've had an incredible showing from the older generation. In Season 3, Teri and Ian made it to the final three, and who will ever forget the gutsy performance of Meredith and Gretchen in Season 7? This year the oldest racers are Fran and Barry Lazarus, and right from the starting line, they seemed to show that they are one of the most energetic teams and certainly the most well traveled. 4:00 pmMost of the teams have finished the challenge and have arrived at this old warehouse to watch an indigenous cultural ceremony. The teams are required to take part in this experience by lighting a candle and handing it over to one of the locals in order to receive their next clue. Some teams are clearly on a mission to get their next clue and don't notice what's going on around them, while others get caught up in the moment and become visibly affected. 5:00 pmFinally, everyone starts showing up to meet me at the first pit stop. The first chat that I have with each of the teams always serves as a good indicator for what we can expect. One of the most common things I hear at the first pit stop is that the race is nothing like they expected and that somehow even the simplest of tasks — such as reading directions — takes on a whole new meaning. Everyone thinks it looks so easy on television, but they're shocked at how difficult it is to actually run the race. One of the hardest things for teams to get used to is having their entire lives put under a microscope. They get so caught up in the moment that they forget that everything they do and say is being captured on camera. This means that any conflict will be analyzed by millions of viewers and ultimately the teams will have to face up to their actions. Some have told me after the race that they've actually made adjustments to their behavior after they watched themselves on television. And this is just the beginning. There are still more than 50,000 miles to the finish line, and the cameras will be rolling every step of the way. Are you addicted to shows like The Amazing Race? Find out the real reason reality is a hit. |
Rene Auberjonois: From Benson to Boston Before "snark" was even a word, Rene Auberjonois was wonderfully full of it as Clayton Runnymede Endicott III, the fancy-speaking foil to Robert Guillaume's titular manservant-turned-civil servant on the '80s comedy Benson. These days — and a sci-fi-fabulous run as Deep Space Nine's Odo later — the veteran actor is sharing a set with fellow Star Trek universe alum William Shatner on ABC's Boston Legal (Tuesdays at 10 pm/ET). In fact, Auberjonois' prickly Paul Lewiston recently embarked on a juicy new story arc, one of the many topics covered in this Q&A with TVGuide.com. TVGuide.com: Long before there was The West Wing, before there was Commander in Chief, there was a little inside-political-life show called Benson, wasn't there?Rene Auberjonois: [Laughs] Oh, for god's sake. You must have been a kid when that was on, judging from your voice. But it was a great show for kids. TVGuide.com: What do you remember most about that experience?Auberjonois: Well, I had resisted doing a series for a number of years. The first TV show I ever did was an episode of The Mod Squad, in 1971, and after that I was offered several different series, two of which ran a long, long time. One was M*A*S*H — I was asked to re-create the role I had done in the feature film, of Father Mulcahy. But when Benson came along, it was the right time. My kids were both in school and I really needed to settle down and have a steady income. It was a magical piece of timing in that I got to get up every morning, make the kids their breakfast and drive them to school, and then go to work with a wonderful group of actors. TVGuide.com: In addition to turning down the M*A*S*H series, you were also offered the role of Bosley in Charlie's Angels?Auberjonois: Yeah, but I don't like... [Groans, then laughs] I should shut up about those things, because the actors who did them... [William] Christopher, who played Mulcahy [on TV], was fabulous. I couldn't imagine anybody else doing it better. The same thing is true for [David Doyle on] Charlie's Angels. Why would I even compare myself? TVGuide.com: The law-firm-based legal-drama genre has been plugging away for at the very least 20 years, if you measure from L.A. Law. How do you think David E. Kelley manages to keep it fresh on Boston Legal?Auberjonois: I don't know. I'm amazed. How do you keep it fresh? I came off seven years on a Star Trek series that constantly amazed me. I tell you, after Deep Space Nine, I went on to do a guest-shot thing during Season 1 of Enterprise. Scott Bakula and I were on the set talking one day and he said, "This is a good script." I said, "Yeah, yeah, we did this one in Season 3." He looked at me like, "What?!" You do tend to tell the same stories again and again. I think the way David E. Kelley keeps it fresh is by dealing with the present and things that are happening in the news every day. It's not like Law & Order's "ripped from the headlines" stories, but David has a very strong sense of his civil responsibility. I know that sometimes he worries that he gets preachy, but I tell you, I wait every week to get the script and read James Spader's closing arguments. I'm so proud to be part of a show that deals with issues head on. Although it's totally clear where David's heart lies, he always manages to somehow present both sides and skew difficult issues in a way you don't expect. That is how he keeps it fresh. TVGuide.com: What do you think are the biggest hurdles facing network TV?Auberjonois: The real thing now is the difference between what you can do on cable and what you can do on network. One of the remarkable things about David is that Boston Legal is a show that, on face value, should be on cable, where he can use the language that obviously he's meaning to use. In fact, when we first get our script, he leaves the language the way he means it to be, and then you adjust it. You don't say, "F--- off," you say something else, but we know as actors what the intention is. So for me that's the big difference. Also, the very nature of the number of commercials leaves you 42 minutes [of storytelling] and really dictates the structure into five acts, and that is very, very difficult to deal with. A lot of shows don't deal with it terribly successfully, but David — and I really admire this — saw the skeleton that was required to hold the body together and he writes to it. I've heard him say in interviews that he would love to not have to do that, but I think he loves to be writing for network television because he wants to reach that kind of audience, the kind that doesn't watch cable. TVGuide.com: Do you and Shatner share sci-fi-convention war stories?Auberjonois: [Chuckles] To a degree. I've got to tell you, one of the great joys is Shatner. I just adore the man. If you had asked me five years ago — his reputation as a diva had preceded him and not to his best advantage. But then I started to meet him at conventions and I was completely charmed by him. One of the wonderful things about Bill is how interested he is in other people. He asks questions, as if he's Larry King. He has this insatiable curiosity about people, whether it's the grip or a craft-services guy or a makeup person.... TVGuide.com: What'd you think when Boston Legal dropped in that Star Trek communicator sound effect when Denny flipped open his cell phone?Auberjonois: Loved it. There have also been other things, like a Klingon reference in the show about salmon fishing and "cling on" bacteria. Spader says something about cling-ons and Shatner goes, "Klingons?" [Laughs] TVGuide.com: You had some interesting and very different father-daughter scenes in the Feb. 21 episode.Auberjonois: Yeah, that's the beginning of an arc in which we find out a lot more about the private side of Paul Lewiston, and I love having that. Some friends of mine will say, "Oh, they don't use you enough!" and I look at them like, "What, are you wishing me to work hard? I'm 65 years old! I thought I was going to retire when this thing came out of nowhere!" It's the happiest gig of my life and I love to have challenging and interesting things to do. But I also don't mind if I'm just being grumpy Paul Lewiston, keeping everybody in line. TVGuide.com: Paul's daughter, Rachel, is sticking around?Auberjonois: She does for a good number of episodes. She's a wonderful actress, Jayne Brook. We reconcile and then I get suspicious that she's still on drugs, and then I find drugs, and then I do an intervention and have her dragged away to a rehab thing, and then I take custody of the child.... In the course of it, Mark Valley's character, Brad, gets attracted to her. In fact, I just finished shooting a scene where I tell him to stay away from her. [Paul's relationship with his daughter] is part of the fabric of the show now. TVGuide.com: Having played so many judges and lawyers in your career, do you think you could represent yourself in traffic court if need be?Auberjonois: No. [Laughs] TVGuide.com: You have done a great deal of voice work. What are the easiest and hardest aspects?Auberjonois: The easiest is that you do it in an hour and you're out of there. The hardest thing is that often, especially if you are just a guest on Batman or whatever, you get the call to go in and you don't know if you're going to be doing an Italian bank robber or a mad Irish seaman or a German scientist, so you have to really be on your toes and be able to work spontaneously and quickly. TVGuide.com: Lastly, of your many performances, what has been your most demanding acting role? Auberjonois: Ironically, it was another David E. Kelley show, Chicago Hope, where I played a pediatric heart surgeon with Tourette's syndrome. I was very sensitive to the fact that I really had to do some very serious research on it to the point that I felt comfortable representing that particular malady. A year later at some Beverly Hills event to raise consciousness about Tourette's, they showed a clip of it. That made me very proud — that they felt that my representation was not demeaning to the people who have it. |
|
|
|